Re: Table/Column Constraints

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table/Column Constraints
Date: 2000-11-21 14:18:08
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20001121061808.021f92c0@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 12:18 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
>> If this problem is attacked, should one stop at constraints or make certain
>> that other elements like views are dumped properly, too? (or were views
>> fixed for 7.1, I admit to a certain amount of "ignoring pgsql-hackers over
>> the last few months")

...

>Views do seem to be dumped as views by current sources.

Good...definitely a step in the right direction!

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-11-21 14:33:35 Re: (download ANSI SQL benchmark?) Re: Postgres article
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-21 14:14:57 Re: RE: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL