From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c) |
Date: | 2000-11-16 17:58:53 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20001116095853.020f7c90@mail.pacifier.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 09:32 AM 11/16/00 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001116 08:59] wrote:
>> Ewe, so we have this 1/200 second delay for every transaction. Seems
>> bad to me.
>
>I think as long as it becomes a tunable this isn't a bad idea at
>all. Fixing it at 1/200 isn't so great because people not wrapping
>large amounts of inserts/updates with transaction blocks will
>suffer.
I think the default should probably be no delay, and the documentation
on enabling this needs to be clear and obvious (i.e. hard to miss).
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-11-16 17:59:44 | Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-11-16 17:51:15 | AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh |