Re: Performance for seq. scans

From: Steve Heaven <steve(at)thornet(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Jules Bean <jules(at)jellybean(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance for seq. scans
Date: 2000-07-26 11:14:13
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000726121413.0071dbc0@mail.thornet.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 11:51 26/07/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've had a look over the docs and the FAQ and I can't see anything
>answering this, so here goes:
>
>I'm in the (slightly unusual, in a relational world) situation that
>the dominant query on my database is a wildcard search, so that no
>indexes can be used. (E.g. select * from table_a where foo like
>'%bar%').

We were in a similar position and went for the 'Full Text Indexing" extra.
You'll find it in contrib/fulltextindex.
It creates a function which you call on a trigger to produce an index of
words for specified fields. These indexes do get _very_ large (one of ours
is ~800 MB), but it does work very well and speeds searches up enormously.

Steve

--
thorNET - Internet Consultancy, Services & Training
Phone: 01454 854413
Fax: 01454 854412
http://www.thornet.co.uk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jules Bean 2000-07-26 11:28:18 Re: Performance for seq. scans
Previous Message Andrea Aime 2000-07-26 11:06:21 Re: Connecting to PostgreSQL databases