Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
Date: 2000-05-04 14:42:16
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000504074216.00f43a90@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 02:26 PM 5/4/00 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

>From what I've read, the extra cache in the PII/III gives you a 5%
>boost over the Celeron (I'll guess more for some server apps).

For a db server the 100Mhz memory bus of the PII/III probably
wins more than 5% over the 66Mhz memory bus of the Celeron. This
assumes you're database is reasonably big. Lots of memory transfers
going on...

>Intel
>still sells the Xeon chips, which have a cache twice as big as the
>PII/III, but I'm not sure the clock has kept pace and it was always
>overpriced wrt performance.

Katmai Xeons come with cache size ranging from 512K (the same as a PII/PIII
Katmai) to 2MB. That cache, though, is FULL SPEED. Gets you about 10%
over a PII/III Katmai for server-type benchmarks I've seen. But they're
expensive.

You can also go 4-way SMP with them, vs. 2-way with PII/III...

Now the new Coppermines have changed things...the Xeon Cu and PII/III
Cu both have identical 256K full-speed cache. There's not much reason
to buy the Xeon unless you want 4-way SMP, and Intel recognizes this
apparently because the price is only 10% higher for these new parts.

>Not that anyone asked, but imho the best price/performance x86 machine
>has always been a dual processor box one or two clock jumps behind the
>fastest available.

That's what I did, a dual PII450. I bought them (boxed, fan) for $180
each when PIII450s were $250 or so and PIII 500Es $299 (I bought one
of the latter for a home workstation). So it's a PII without the
latest matrix instructions for graphics? How many games will I
run on my web/db server? :)

>You get ~80% more performance for ~5% more cost
>than a uniprocessor at the fastest speed. I haven't looked recently to
>see if there are now uniprocessor machines at the low end that can
>beat the price/performance of the dual-processor setup.

The Athlons do, actually ... but I wouldn't trust the mobos for a
remote server at this point, not until they're proven stable. They're
tricky to build and finicky about power supplies.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-05-04 14:47:14 Re: --enable-locale and SET command ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-04 14:34:53 Hardware/CPU Thoughts (Was: Re: system usage stats )