From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings |
Date: | 2000-02-26 01:17:37 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000225171737.00f960b0@mail.pacifier.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 08:17 PM 2/25/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
>> Well...here's an example of a view that worked in 6.5, with an 8KB
>> block size, that fails in 7.0 unless I build with a 16KB block size:
>
>> create view ec_products_displayable
>> as
>> select * from ec_products
>> where active_p='t';
>
>> You know, I've investigated further and the rule string itself is
>> no where near 8KB. More like 1KB. So there is more to the story
>> than just the string itself.
>
>Really? That's interesting. Could you send me a test case
>(create table and create view commands)?
I'll try to get to it soon.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-26 01:18:31 | Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-26 01:17:17 | Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings |