Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Date: 2000-02-14 04:59:01
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000213205901.01706710@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 03:32 PM 2/14/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:

>I agree you should probably go the whole hog one way or the other. I
>think
>ignoring offset+limit is a useful option, but like I said at the
>beginning, it doesn't bother me _that_ much.

It should bother you that folks who understand how SQL works might
be penalized in order to insulate the fact that those who don't know
how SQL works from an understanding of their own ignorance...

Shouldn't we be more concerned with folks who bother to read an
SQL primer? Or Oracle or Informix docs on SQL?

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-14 05:28:53 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-14 04:57:11 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation