RE: [HACKERS] TODO item

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] TODO item
Date: 2000-02-08 01:06:11
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000207170611.01096db0@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 10:04 AM 2/8/00 +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

>There's already -F option for speeding up.
>Who would want non-WAL mode with strict reliabilty after WAL
>is implemented ?

Exactly. I suspect WAL will actually run faster, or at least
will have that potential when its existence is fully exploited,
than non-WAL non -F.

And it seems to me that touching something as crucial as
disk management in a fundamental way one week before the
release of a hopefully solid beta is pushing things a bit.

But, then again, I'm the resident paranoid conservative, I
guess.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-02-08 01:51:26 Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-08 01:04:31 RE: [HACKERS] TODO item