| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item |
| Date: | 2000-02-07 16:54:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000207085422.01092ec0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:31 AM 2/7/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>I hate to see you give up on this.
>Don't tell me we fsync on every buffer write, and not just at
>transaction commit? That is terrible.
Won't we have many more options in this area, i.e. increasing performance
while maintaining on-disk data integrity, once WAL is implemented?
snapshot+WAL = your database so in theory -F on tables and
the transaction log would be safe as long as you have a snapshot and
as long as the WAL is being fsync'd and you have the disk space to
hold the WAL until you update your snapshot, no?
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-02-07 16:58:17 | Re: [HACKERS] New Globe |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-07 16:47:45 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item |