Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql
Date: 2000-02-01 05:09:28
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000131210928.0106fc90@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:24 PM 1/31/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:

>Agreed here too ... I think what has been setting off a lot of the 'red
>flags' is a larger then normal number of 'buggy commits' ... stuff that
>has to be done, but hasn't been as well thought out/discussed as it should
>have been ...

I think a LOT of it had to do with its being committed to the 7.0
sources, which at the time were supposedly going to be released on
Feb 1 (tomorrow).

If Peter had waited until 7.0 beta then dumped such changes into a new,
7.1 tree with 7.1 some months off I doubt there would've been anything
like the reaction he saw.

Didn't we all agree recently that this had to do mostly with Peter's
misunderstanding of how stable a beta release should be in this project?

(as opposed to other projects which run with a "release early, release
often" pardigm)?

If so, I think we're done with this topic and should be willing to just
let it drop.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Hirt 2000-02-01 07:48:54 union in an in clause and timestamp
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-01 04:59:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql