| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
| Date: | 2000-01-31 17:45:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000131094558.00f068ac@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 09:41 AM 1/31/00 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Of course, removing END/ABORT will touch many applications
> using transactions, but I would vote for it anyway, since
> it's standard.
Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word
used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with?
Of course, removing that would REALLY impact current applications...
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed Loehr | 2000-01-31 18:37:44 | Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? |
| Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 2000-01-31 16:32:55 | Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? |