Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping
Date: 2000-01-25 05:17:28
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000124211728.00f728b0@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 12:08 AM 1/25/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> Dropping constraints on a table just because you drop a column is
>> just butt-ugly.

>We aren't charging 100k either. We do what we can, and spend time where
>it is most valuable.

Perhaps I've misunderstood, then...I'd thought part of the goal was to
compete with the 100K model without charging 100K...

If not, OK.

(BTW, Oracle for development is free and you can actually cruise with
that for some time. A five-user license for non-internet use costs
$1450 for Linux)

And further BTW...some folks recently went through a little handwringing
upon hearing the Interbase will be released in free, open source form.

And there's a recent, though not current, Sybase version available for
Linux users for free, too...

If the point's not to be competitive with other free or low cost options,
is there any point at all?

Is it time for me to apologize for having high standards?

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-01-25 05:20:22 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-25 05:08:01 Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping