From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] column aliases |
Date: | 2000-01-24 18:56:05 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000124105605.01067ec0@mail.pacifier.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:00 PM 1/24/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>IMHO, if there exists a from clause, we could insist,
>that all tables are listed (no implicitly added table),
>since it is really too error prone.
>
>What I would not like to see removed is the ability to
>avoid the from clause alltogether. Like in:
>
>select xor.eval;
Yeah...in porting the arsDigita Community System over from
Oracle, we created a dummy table called "dual" because of
the clunky Oracle-ism involving that table.
In other words, in Oracle you can't say:
select sydate();
because you must have a "from" clause. By convention you
use a dummy built-in table called "dual" which has one row:
select sysdate() from dual;
Ugh. I agree that being able to exclude the from clause
altogether is nice.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-24 19:09:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-24 18:45:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |