| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
| Date: | 2000-01-15 19:55:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000115115500.010a78f0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:31 PM 1/15/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> * Update table SET table.value = 3 fails(SQL standard says this is OK)
>>
>> Not the standard I'm looking at. Someone please enlighten me.
If this is indeed the standard, it looks to me as though Bruce is
reading it right. Makes sense, too, only one table can be updated
at a time, so there's no opportunity for ambiguity in column names
on the left side. What's the point?
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-01-15 21:44:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-15 19:32:51 | Re: [HACKERS] flex |