| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Xun Cheng <xun(at)cs(dot)ucsb(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) |
| Date: | 2000-01-14 16:08:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000114080811.01072620@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 01:16 AM 1/14/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>We don't block people for working on ietms. However, we do try and set
>priorities based on the open items we have. I hope we don't appear
>heavy-handed in this regard.
Not at all. And though I've triggered this dicussion, I'd be the
first to agree it is minor in importance compared to things like
outer joins, the WAL implementation, and Jan's large object work.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-14 16:14:44 | Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-14 16:06:24 | Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed |