Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Frans Van Elsacker <fve(at)atbib(dot)be>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, jbj(at)redhat(dot)com, gafton(at)redhat(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1
Date: 1999-12-17 01:06:01
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.19991216170601.010c1380@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 07:20 PM 12/16/99 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:

>I'll see what I can find -- this also explains some strange regression
>results I was mailed awhile back. In fact, let's try regression on the
>RH 6.1 fresh install.... AND I AM GETTING FAILURES THAT I HAVE NEVER
>GOTTEN AT HOME ON MY UPGRADE REDHAT 6.1!

I know that AOLserver works on 6.0 and has problems on 6.1 (a 2.2.12
kernel) and works again if you upgrade your 6.1 to a 2.2.13 kernel.
(have to use "-i" on 6.1 or it won't work, though I forget offhand
what "-i" does for AOLserver)

This ain't specific help but at least PostgreSQL's not alone in
having weird problems with RH 6.* releases.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-17 01:35:34 Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-17 00:32:19 Re: [HACKERS] \copy problem