| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gunther Schadow <gunther(at)aurora(dot)rg(dot)iupui(dot)edu>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | "hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY |
| Date: | 1999-12-14 18:54:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.19991214105437.010891c0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 01:34 PM 12/14/99 -0500, Gunther Schadow wrote:
>so BIGINT (as a synonym for INT8 is not supported). Is
>BIGINT not a standard SQL92 or de Facto?
I've got Date's book sitting here, and it says that integer
and smallint are standard, with int being a standard
abbreviation for integer. So apparently bigint is
a common additional type, not standard SQL92.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-14 19:26:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Create Group |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-14 18:45:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining |