Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma
Date: 1999-12-10 11:17:05
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.19991210031705.00ed6168@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:28 AM 12/28/99 +0100, Karel Zak - Zakkr wrote:
>Thank for all suggestion. I finaly use in to_char() cache via static buffer,
>and if format-picture will bigger than this buffer, to_char will work as
>without cache. This solution eliminate memory leak - this solution is used
>in current datetime routines. It is good compromise.

Seems simple and safe, yes. My objection was really due to my concern
over memory leaks. The "to_char()" function will be a great help to
those porting over Oracle applications to Postgres.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-12-10 11:38:48 Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Previous Message Don Baccus 1999-12-10 11:08:52 Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd)