I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.

From: Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.
Date: 2004-11-09 20:42:01
Message-ID: 2vcp1nF2k0ftbU1@uni-berlin.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Obviously, there cannot be 21 postgresql groups in the comp.* hierarchy.
Many of the 21 are not used that often, and would not be of much popularity
to those on usenet.

I did a check on news.postgresql.org to see which newsgroups are the most
popular and also the ones which cover the relevant postgresql topics. Most
of the postgresql topics and traffic are represented in these four
newsgroups:

comp.databases.postgresql.admin
comp.databases.postgresql.general
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
comp.databases.postgresql.sql

These are the four newsgroups that will be in the next version of the RFD.
The newsgroups will be unmoderated, although the posters will be moderated
at the gateway side, with those who are subscribed will see their posts
make it to usenet and the mailing list.

A good way to think of this is that the subscription is a fast way to get
through moderation. You have the option of not getting any emails.

For those on the news.groups who are not familiar with postgresql, join
news.postgresql.org and see the groups list. You will see that making
these four groups proper members of the big 8 would solve most of the
usenet problems since the other groups do not have nearly the same amount
of traffic.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Woodchuck Bill 2004-11-09 20:43:44 Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Previous Message Marcel Beaudoin 2004-11-09 20:41:35 Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general