| From: | Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-general"(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RFD |
| Date: | 2004-11-05 05:41:09 |
| Message-ID: | 2v0ibhF2dsc92U1@uni-berlin.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> I saw a post indicating a request for discussion on the creation of an
>> official big 8 newsgroup comp.databases.postgresql.general. According to
>> the notice this newsgroup already exists in google groups and is actively
>> being used. The discussion will be in news.groups.
>
I would like to point out that it is NOT creating a different group. It
will still be the same, and there will not be a split or anything. What
will happen is that the postgresql group will become legitimate, and
therefore all usenet servers will carry the group.
So this is a process that should have happened when the
comp.databases.postresql.* usenet groups were originally created. I'm
seeing a lot of support for this, except for one person (who seems to not
like me personally).
I would welcome people to read through news.groups and follow the postgresql
threads.
P.S. I am just posting this so people can review the RFD (request for
discussion) and please post any suggestions on improvements/likes/dislikes
so it can be made better. As not to distract the discussions away from the
normal topic, I will post to the postgresql groups no more than once per
week until it is time for the call for votes (CFV).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Bell | 2004-11-05 06:06:15 | Re: RFD |
| Previous Message | Mike Cox | 2004-11-05 05:26:39 | Re: RFD |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eddy Macnaghten | 2004-11-05 06:05:49 | ANNOUNCE: SHSQL - SQL for LINUX/UNIX Shell scripts |
| Previous Message | Mike Cox | 2004-11-05 05:26:39 | Re: RFD |