From: | "Edoardo Ceccarelli" <eddy(at)axa(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | "'David F(dot) Skoll'" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, "'Edoardo Ceccarelli'" <eddy(at)axa(dot)it> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | R: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize |
Date: | 2004-02-05 02:18:31 |
Message-ID: | 2s28b9$kqpmo@mailr-1.tiscali.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Yes, you are right but it wasn't the case this time, I have run the explain plenty of
times with same results. I think that the reason was that I made a simple VACUUM,
after a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE (1h!!) things are ok
Best Regards
Edoardo
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: David F. Skoll [mailto:dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com]
> Inviato: giovedì 5 febbraio 2004 3.17
> A: Edoardo Ceccarelli
> Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Oggetto: Re: R: [ADMIN] slow seqscan after vacuum analize
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Edoardo Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> > Things are worst only for seqscan, when it uses indexscan
> timing is good.
>
> It might just be that running VACUUM flushed the operating
> system's buffer cache.
>
> I always try running two or three EXPLAIN ANALYZE's in a row
> for the same query. Usually, the first one takes much longer
> than the rest.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-02-05 04:18:39 | Re: R: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize |
Previous Message | David F. Skoll | 2004-02-05 02:17:02 | Re: R: slow seqscan after vacuum analize |