Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed

From: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed
Date: 2017-05-25 12:54:59
Message-ID: 2f889d5f-4ad6-4596-eb94-48f4f0f61b05@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/25/2017 03:38 PM, tushar wrote:
> While performing - Alter subscription..SET , I found that NOTICE
> message is coming duplicate next time , which is not needed anymore.
There is an another example - where i am getting "ERROR: subscription
table 16435 in subscription 16684 does not exist" in standby log file

2017-05-25 13:51:48.825 BST [32138] NOTICE: removed subscription for
table public.t96
2017-05-25 13:51:48.825 BST [32138] NOTICE: removed subscription for
table public.t97
2017-05-25 13:51:48.826 BST [32138] NOTICE: removed subscription for
table public.t98
2017-05-25 13:51:48.826 BST [32138] NOTICE: removed subscription for
table public.t99
2017-05-25 13:51:48.826 BST [32138] NOTICE: removed subscription for
table public.t100
2017-05-25 13:51:48.827 BST [32138] LOG: duration: 35.404 ms statement:
alter subscription c1 set publication p1 refresh;
2017-05-25 13:51:49.192 BST [32347] LOG: starting logical replication
worker for subscription "c1"
2017-05-25 13:51:49.198 BST [32368] LOG: logical replication sync for
subscription c1, table t16 started
2017-05-25 13:51:49.198 BST [32368] ERROR: subscription table 16429 in
subscription 16684 does not exist
2017-05-25 13:51:49.199 BST [32347] LOG: starting logical replication
worker for subscription "c1"
2017-05-25 13:51:49.200 BST [32065] LOG: worker process: logical
replication worker for subscription 16684 sync 16429 (PID 32368) exited
with exit code 1
2017-05-25 13:51:49.204 BST [32369] LOG: logical replication sync for
subscription c1, table t17 started
2017-05-25 13:51:49.204 BST [32369] ERROR: subscription table 16432 in
subscription 16684 does not exist
2017-05-25 13:51:49.205 BST [32347] LOG: starting logical replication
worker for subscription "c1"
2017-05-25 13:51:49.205 BST [32065] LOG: worker process: logical
replication worker for subscription 16684 sync 16432 (PID 32369) exited
with exit code 1
2017-05-25 13:51:49.209 BST [32370] LOG: logical replication sync for
subscription c1, table t18 started
2017-05-25 13:51:49.209 BST [32370] ERROR: subscription table 16435 in
subscription 16684 does not exist
2017-05-25 13:51:49.210 BST [32347] LOG: starting logical replication
worker for subscription "c1"
2017-05-25 13:51:49.210 BST [32065] LOG: worker process: logical
replication worker for subscription 16684 sync 16435 (PID 32370) exited
with exit code 1
2017-05-25 13:51:49.213 BST [32371] LOG: logical replication sync for
subscription c1, table t19 started
2017-05-25 13:51:49.213 BST [32371] ERROR: subscription table 16438 in
subscription 16684 does not exist
2017-05-25 13:51:49.214 BST [32347] LOG: starting logical replication
worker for subscription "c1"

Steps to reproduce -
X cluster ->
create 100 tables , publish all tables (create publication pub for table
t1,t2,t2..........t100;)
create one more table (create table t101(n int), create publication ,
publish only that table (create publication p1 for table t101;)

Y Cluster ->
create subscription (create subscription c1 connection 'host=localhost
port=5432 user=centos ' publication pub;
alter subscription c1 set publication p1 refresh;
alter subscription c1 set publication pub refresh;
alter subscription c1 set publication p1 refresh;

check the log file.

--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-25 13:32:21 Re: Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-05-25 12:51:55 Re: Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse