From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | max(dot)ziermann(at)htw-dresden(dot)de, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Triggers on underlying tables of updatable views |
Date: | 2021-11-22 15:41:07 |
Message-ID: | 2f54dbb7d59aacacbc4654b0bc56faaebe993e09.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 12:06 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> "Note that the user performing the insert, update or delete on the view must
> have the corresponding insert, update or delete privilege on the view. In
> addition the view's owner must have the relevant privileges on the
> underlying base relations, but the user performing the update does not need
> any permissions on the underlying base relations (see Section 41.5)."
>
> Could it be made more clear that triggers on a underlying table of an
> updatable view are still executed with the permissions of the user
> performing an insert/update/delete on the view?
But that is not the case: that trigger will be executed with the permissions
of the owner of the underlying table.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-11-22 17:41:51 | max_slot_wal_keep_size unit is not specified |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-11-22 12:06:59 | Triggers on underlying tables of updatable views |