| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gerry Reno <greno(at)verizon(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication |
| Date: | 2009-06-23 10:24:23 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0906230324n1e2bc44k947c92b1588e8c58@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ<devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> I *used* MySQL replication, and I do know what it means. It is not user
> friendly, come on.
Well, I used it too - it is. If you want to replicate _everything_.
Never had troubles with it, but that was database holding stuff for
Zope, rest of the crap was in Zope's "database" (which is replicated
by rsync).
But I had so many other issues with mysql, I gave up. It is so bad
now, that I refuse to work on contracts with mysql involved. (random
crashes, data loss, so many bugs, and odd behaviour, it allows
strange sql syntax, etc) - iow, I can honestly believe that they
screwed up replication too. Especially since their motto is, that the
thing must be easy enough for someone without SQL experience. Which
explains everything anyway :)
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | DelGurth | 2009-06-23 10:37:04 | Cache lookup failed for type 70385664 |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-06-23 10:03:15 | Re: Replication |