| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: question on serial key |
| Date: | 2009-05-22 15:41:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0905220841i548b8606t612e7e23b5e4f60f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of; it's a fuzzy design choice with benefits and
> costs for either option. There are lots of people who arbitrarily
> pick one side which tends to make things worse, using one or the other
> *exclusively* will add complication. General terms to search for are
> Natural keys vs. Surrogate keys.
Yes, it is always worth reading on subject. But that's pure theory,
now there are also database specific concerns. Hence my 'own
experience' suggestion. :)
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nico Sabbi | 2009-05-22 15:42:27 | I can't drop a user if I don't drop his grants beforehand?????????????????? |
| Previous Message | Alex Thurlow | 2009-05-22 15:35:35 | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. |