| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types |
| Date: | 2008-12-26 20:57:04 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0812261257x482f30a7y80345bed8a4e090b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
another glance at source code, and docs tells me - that there's not
such thing as default value for custom type - unless that type is
defined as new base scalar type. So probably, that would require
postgresql to allow users to define default values for composite types
as well, like that:
create type foo AS
(
a int default 1,
b foodomain default 'foo',
....
);
Going through source code, I have no idea where that would go -
because I got only experience in creating types + custom indices, not
hacking postgresql guts. More help required here, please ..
(I don't know, should that go to -hackers [too]. My recent history
there probably makes majority of folks to ignore my posts straight
away).
Thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-12-26 21:10:08 | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-12-26 20:54:21 | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types |