Re: lack of consequence with domains and types

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Erik Jones" <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
Date: 2008-12-22 21:08:56
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0812221308o695d10bj2ab25fb0e6c4cf12@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com> wrote:
> As mentioned above, by "fixing" the behavior to be what you're expecting
> you'd be breaking the defined behavior of ALTER TABLE.

I don't understand. The domain's have default values, how will it
break alter table ? Please explain.

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2008-12-23 02:27:57 Re: Backup Policy & Disk Space Issues
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-12-22 19:13:55 Re: How are locks managed in PG?