Re: Disallow USING clause when altering type of generated column

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disallow USING clause when altering type of generated column
Date: 2024-08-22 07:10:52
Message-ID: 2f489d6a-1c71-4264-8748-560bb5080bff@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.08.24 08:15, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:38:49 +0800
> jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 4:57 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Cannot specify USING when altering type of a generated column, because
>> + * that would violate the generation expression.
>> + */
>> + if (attTup->attgenerated && def->cooked_default)
>> + ereport(ERROR,
>> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
>> + errmsg("cannot specify USING when altering type of generated column"),
>> + errdetail("Column \"%s\" is a generated column.", colName)));
>> +
>>
>> errcode should be ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED?
>
>
> Although ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION is used for en error on changing
> type of inherited column, I guess that is because it prevents from breaking
> consistency between inherited and inheriting tables as a result of the command.
> In this sense, maybe, ERRCODE_INVALID_COLUMN_DEFINITION is proper here, because
> this check is to prevent inconsistency between columns in a tuple.

Yes, that was my thinking. I think of ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED as
"we could add it in the future", but that does not seem to apply here.

>> also
>> CREATE TABLE gtest27 (
>> a int,
>> b text collate "C",
>> x text GENERATED ALWAYS AS ( b || '_2') STORED
>> );
>>
>> ALTER TABLE gtest27 ALTER COLUMN x TYPE int;
>> ERROR: column "x" cannot be cast automatically to type integer
>> HINT: You might need to specify "USING x::integer".
>>
>> should we do something for the errhint, since this specific errhint is wrong?
>
> Yes. I think we don't have to output the hint message if we disallow USING
> for generated columns. Or, it may be useful to allow only a simple cast
> for the generated column instead of completely prohibiting USING.

Good catch. Here is an updated patch that fixes this.

This got me thinking whether disallowing USING here would actually
prevent some useful cases, like if you want to change the type of a
generated column and need to supply an explicit cast, as the hint
suggested. But this actually wouldn't work anyway, because later on it
will try to cast the generation expression, and that will fail in the
same way because it uses the same coerce_to_target_type() parameters.
So I think this patch won't break anything. Maybe what I'm describing
here could be implemented as a new feature, but I'm looking at this as a
bug fix right now.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Disallow-USING-clause-when-altering-type-of-gener.patch text/plain 2.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-08-22 07:11:04 RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
Previous Message Tender Wang 2024-08-22 07:07:26 Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails