Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Date: 2021-07-28 03:44:50
Message-ID: 2ee95a25-2cba-c661-4aa5-66ce518f047b@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/28 6:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 27/07/2021 19:49, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Anyway I attached the patch that changes only xact_redo_abort()
>> so that it calls XLogFlush() to update min recovery point.
>
> Looks good to me, thanks! FWIW, I used the attached script to reproduce this.

Thanks for the review!

Barring any objection, I will commit the patch and
back-patch it to all supported versions.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-07-28 03:54:48 Re: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-07-28 03:43:58 Re: 回复：Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort