From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | David Wheeler <dwheeler(at)dgitsystems(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Cameron Redpath <credpath(at)dgitsystems(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Slow planning, fast execution for particular 3-table query |
Date: | 2019-11-04 04:37:00 |
Message-ID: | 2e94543c5f92f6902ae51a5e6f4f569558fb548a.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 03:04 +0000, David Wheeler wrote:
> We’re having trouble working out why the planning time for this particular query is slow
> (~2.5s vs 0.9ms execution time). As you can see below, there are only 3 tables involved
> so it’s hard to imagine what decisions the planner has to make that take so long. After
> 5 runs the prepared-statement code kicks in and it becomes quick, but it’s quite
> infuriating for the first 5 runs given the execution is so much faster.
>
> Are you able to give any tips what might be taking so long (and how we might improve it)?
>
[...]
> Planning time: 2429.682 ms
>
> Execution time: 0.914 ms
Strange.
Are any of your catalog tables unusually large?
SELECT pg_relation_size(t.oid),
t.relname
FROM pg_class AS t
JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON t.relnamespace = n.oid
WHERE t.relkind = 'r'
ORDER BY pg_relation_size(t.oid) DESC
LIMIT 10;
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Wheeler | 2019-11-04 04:42:00 | Re: Slow planning, fast execution for particular 3-table query |
Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2019-11-04 03:04:45 | Slow planning, fast execution for particular 3-table query |