From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | visibility maps |
Date: | 2008-12-05 07:10:10 |
Message-ID: | 2e78013d0812042310o1a5352d8h693e387e6ef00ce9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
/*
* We don't need to lock the page, as we're only looking at a single
bit.
*/
result = (map[mapByte] & (1 << mapBit)) ? true : false;
Isn't this a dangerous assumption to make ? I am not so sure that even a bit
can be read atomically on all platforms. I think the only caller of
visibilitymap_test() is VACUUM which can live with a false information. But
if this is indeed a problem, should we either fix this or have explicit
comments there ?
BTW, my apologies for random comments. I haven't followed the discussion
well, neither done a full review. So these things might have been discussed
before.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-12-05 07:25:17 | Re: visibility maps |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2008-12-05 07:00:28 | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |