Re: Review: Hot standby

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby
Date: 2008-11-25 13:32:57
Message-ID: 2e78013d0811250532k53807762o592b99081d931381@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
>
> Huh? The "read only" transaction mode is not hard read-only anyway,
> so if that's the only step being taken, it's entirely useless.
>
>
I think there are explicit checks for some utility statements (like VACUUM),
but I haven't checked if all necessary code paths are covered or not.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-11-25 13:52:34 Re: Brittleness in regression test setup
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-11-25 13:32:44 Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation