Re: Review: Hot standby

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Hot standby
Date: 2008-11-24 07:40:14
Message-ID: 2e78013d0811232340x44ebe2cex8c0c883de729efb8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
>
> I don't think so, because this section of code is only called if there
> is redo to perform. If no redo, we never get here.
>
>
OK. But why not open up the database for read-only access when there is no
redo action to be done ? Or am I missing something trivial ?

Anyways, I will wait for your latest version to continue with the
test/review.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2008-11-24 07:48:24 Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2008-11-24 07:35:12 Snapshot warning