From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: page macros cleanup |
Date: | 2008-07-04 08:50:12 |
Message-ID: | 2e78013d0807040150w393ad72codaf06a6ac12a83ce@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Good catch. I lost in basic arithmetic. What I see now that original
> definition count sizeof(ItemIdData) twice and on other side it does not take
> care about MAXALING correctly. I think correct formula is:
>
> #define HashMaxItemSize(page) \
> (PageGetPageSize(page) - \
> ( MAXALIGN(SizeOfPageHeaderData + sizeof(ItemIdData))+ \
> MAXALIGN(sizeof(HashPageOpaqueData)) \
> )\
> )
>
> What do you think?
>
Yes. I think that's the correct way.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-07-04 08:51:55 | Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-04 08:44:25 | Re: WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements |