Re: Nasty bug in heap_page_prune

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nasty bug in heap_page_prune
Date: 2008-03-13 17:17:05
Message-ID: 2e78013d0803131017ic3d9591qa2a2d81df39db96c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Yeah, I started with that same idea. But AFAICS there is no percentage
> in postponing the broadcast until commit/abort; we may as well push the
> messages out immediately.

Seems like a good plan to me.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meetesh Karia 2008-03-13 18:06:31 Re: Encoding problems with migration from 8.0.14 to 8.3.0 on Windows
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-13 16:33:19 Re: Encoding problems with migration from 8.0.14 to 8.3.0 on Windows