From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |
Date: | 2007-09-01 03:13:48 |
Message-ID: | 2e78013d0708312013l73017defp80cc2258f68ec5eb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On 9/1/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
> I see this the other way around: if it doesn't work on system catalogs,
> it probably doesn't work, period. I'm not in favor of treating the
> catalogs differently.
>
>
Now that I hear you, I know what to do next :-)
I don't think there is any fundamental problem with system catalogs,
its only the additional complexity that I was worried about. Anyways,
I will rework things as per your suggestion. And I take your point that
making it work on all tables will give us more confidence on the code.
Thanks,
Pavan
P.S. Next week is bad for me :-( I am on vacation on Thursday/Friday
and for remaining days, I may not be able to spend extra cycles,
apart from regular working hours.
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-09-01 17:19:20 | Linkage for escape strings |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-08-31 18:55:47 | Re: enum types and binary queries |