Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum
Date: 2007-07-06 06:00:19
Message-ID: 2e78013d0707052300u6d8a8ba9l4ce4c35eba35dc2f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 7/5/07, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:04:35 -0400 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Most likely it is worried about XID wraparound, and those are precisely
> > the tables that need urgent vacuumed because they haven't been vacuumed
> > in a long time.
>
> No, autovacuum is doing this with every run. Beside this, the database has
> only some 10k changes per day. The wraparound was my first idea, but i
> don't see a reason, why this should be happen with every autovacuum run.
>
>
Did you check freeze_max_age values in the pg_autovacuum table ? A very
small value can trigger XID wraparound related VACUUMs in every run.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannes Dorbath 2007-07-06 06:30:03 Re: tsearch2 in multilingual database?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2007-07-06 03:02:14 Re: Localization trouble