From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: increase insert into local table from remote oracle table preformance |
Date: | 2018-08-14 05:21:23 |
Message-ID: | 2e6e6255-d33f-dfc5-0470-b3adff075525@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Hi, we probably need more inforation to offer anything useful here, e.g:
- The network bandwidth between the 2 hosts
- the number of partitions on the Postgres end (i.e how many days in
your case)
- single or batched INSERT
The lack of indexes is probably not going to effect INSERT performance
that much, but the number of partition tables has a huge impact, so we
need to know this stuff!
Cheers
Mark
On 14/08/18 08:34, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using postgresql v10.4. I have a local partitioned table (by range
> - data, every day has its own table). I'm using the oracle_fdw
> extension to bring data from the oracle partitioned table into my
> local postgresql (insert into local select * from remote_oracle).
> Currently, I dont have any indexes on the postgresql`s table. It takes
> me 10 hours to copy 200G over the network and it is very slow.
> Any recommandations what can I change or improve ?
>
>
> Thanks , Mariel.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pavan95 | 2018-08-14 05:29:40 | Re: logical Replication |
Previous Message | Rajni Baliyan | 2018-08-14 03:24:11 | Re: Logical replication monitoring |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-08-14 07:12:40 | Re: increase insert into local table from remote oracle table preformance |
Previous Message | legrand legrand | 2018-08-13 21:03:58 | Re: Fwd: increase insert into local table from remote oracle table preformance |