Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date: 2018-08-11 13:16:28
Message-ID: 2e674bd6-3bc2-9d70-7d03-db48f7ea5877@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/11/2018 05:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
>> I'm concerned that this item has the potential to delay the release,
>> since, as you said, we're back to the drawing board.
>
> Me too. I will absolutely not vote to release 11.0 before we've
> solved this ...
>

Not sure. I can easily reproduce that on REL_10_STABLE, so it's not a
new issue specific to 11.0.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-08-11 13:40:19 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-08-11 13:16:13 Re: FailedAssertion on partprune