From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Brb815(at)g(dot)harvard(dot)edu, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language |
Date: | 2023-08-11 21:05:48 |
Message-ID: | 2e5ca697-a6a8-7d9a-0a2b-9c69dc3d59b4@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 8/11/23 2:46 PM, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/external-pl.html
> Description:
>
> The documentation [1] contains a list of independently maintained procedural
> languages. Recently, PL/Rust [2] has reached its version 1.0 [3] and appears
> to be stable.
>
> Major companies have expressed interest in the extension. Kiwi Copple, the
> founder of Supabase, has stated his company is researching the language for
> his platform [4]. Meanwhile, Amazon's RDS team has already announced support
> for PL/Rust as a trusted language extension [5] on their PostgreSQL
> instances [6].
>
> Considering the increasing support and stability for PL/Rust, it should be
> referenced within Postgresql's docs [1].
There's an up-to-date list of the different PL's in on this page in the
wiki:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PL_Matrix
Similar to this thread[1], I wonder if we just link to the wiki from the
documentation, given it will be easier to maintain the list from there.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-08-12 16:45:20 | Re: Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-08-11 18:46:28 | Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language |