Re: using pg_basebackup for point in time recovery

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pierre Timmermans <ptim007(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: using pg_basebackup for point in time recovery
Date: 2018-06-21 23:26:57
Message-ID: 2e454930-6128-4eed-3513-5ef2c965281a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 21/06/18 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch which includes your suggestion. What do you think?
> As that's an improvement, only HEAD would get that clarification.

Say what? If the clarification applies to previous versions, as it
does, it should be backpatched. This isn't a change in behavior, it's a
change in the description of existing behavior.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-06-21 23:50:38 Re: using pg_basebackup for point in time recovery
Previous Message David Pacheco 2018-06-21 23:22:02 Re: Can PostgreSQL create new WAL files instead of reusing old ones?