| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: pg_collation_actual_version() -> pg_collation_current_version(). |
| Date: | 2021-02-23 06:03:12 |
| Message-ID: | 2e30284c-1440-a98a-43fe-ad6ebc7a10bb@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 22.02.21 12:28, Thomas Munro wrote:
> pg_collation_actual_version() -> pg_collation_current_version().
>
> The new name seems a bit more natural.
>
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210117215940.GE8560%40telsasoft.com
I don't find where this change was discussed in that thread. I
specifically chose that name to indicate, "not the current version in
the database, but the version the OS thinks it should be". I think the
rename loses that distinction.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-02-23 07:23:19 | Re: pgsql: pg_collation_actual_version() -> pg_collation_current_version(). |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-02-23 04:28:36 | pgsql: Fix an oversight in ReorderBufferFinishPrepared. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-02-23 06:12:28 | RE: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-02-23 05:50:41 | Re: pg_temp_%d namespace creation can invalidate all the cached plan in other backends |