| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
| Date: | 2009-06-02 23:50:18 |
| Message-ID: | 2d4a65b6d0469ee3dd778f885ac3eb18@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Umm, no. there are *no* ,v files in my working copies (I just checked,
> to make sure I wasn't on crack). The repository has them, but the
> working copy does not. SVN does keep the equivalent - that's how you can
> work offline for doing things like 'svn diff'. But it makes the repo
> quite ugly, in fact. Running recursive grep on a subversion working copy
> is quite nasty.
grep -r? No need to use that anymore when a tool like ack is available.
It ignores .svn dirs by default, and basically works the way most
people wish grep worked:
I also agree with Tom Lane elsewhere in this thread that a lot of this is
what may turn out to be pointless wheel spinning: certainly other big
projects (esp. Linux) must have encountered and solved these problems?
Anyone know a kernel hacker / git expert?
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200906021949
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkoluqsACgkQvJuQZxSWSsi0/ACdHQMZeixC5yMYOp0wkqZi/qEE
cqsAnjpjURChqOGOB8vmJ3GjQCm4Ts3n
=4pr9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-06-02 23:53:23 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-06-02 23:47:11 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |