Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!

On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 6:24 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
>>>> Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
>>>> moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
>>> It's entirely possible you'll need *less*, as you'll be absorbing the
>>> benefit of several years' worth of performance improvements. But this
>>> is such a workload-dependent thing that there's no general answer.
>>
>> XML stored in blobs (not sure whether text or bytea) and b-tree indexes.
>>
>
> A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to 10.0?
>
> Obviously you're not one to upgrade often so shouldn't you take advantage
> of all of the new features and improvements when "finally" (to use your
> own word) upgrading?
>

There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production.

--
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification