On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It would be good to fix it I suppose, but what with VACUUM FULL being on
> the edge of deprecation anyway, it's hard to muster enthusiasm for doing
> a (probably) large additional amount of work on it, I think most
> hackers would prefer to spend time on making it unnecessary than making
> it more bulletproof.
>
Interesting. What is planned substitute for VACUUM FULL? CLUSTER?
Regards
Mikko