From: | "Mikko Partio" <mpartio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering (shared disk) |
Date: | 2007-08-17 10:18:35 |
Message-ID: | 2ca799770708170318r8929b54g377171c644936e43@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/17/07, Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 17.08.2007 11:12, Mikko Partio wrote:
> > Maybe I'm just better off using the more simple (crude?) method of drbd
> +
> > heartbeat?
>
> Crude? Use what you like to use, but you should keep one thing in mind:
> If you don't know the software you are running in each and every detail,
> how it behaves in each and every situation you can think of, it's a bad
> idea to use it in a HA setup.
>
> You don't want to be one of those admins that just configured something
> in a few days, moved production stuff on it and fail to recover from a
> split brain situation. Setting up a HA environment is something you do
> in months, not days, at least if you want to do it right. There is so
> much that can go wrong, and so much to learn. Keep it simple.
>
Exactly my thoughts, as I have some experience with drbd and I know it
works. My point was that since I have access to a san environment, a shared
storage would be a more "elegant" solution, but as you pointed out it's
probably better to stick to the method that feels most comfortable.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Regards
MP
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2007-08-17 10:27:34 | Re: [RESEND] Transaction auto-abort causes grief with Spring Framework |
Previous Message | Hannes Dorbath | 2007-08-17 09:47:13 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering (shared disk) |