From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica. |
Date: | 2024-10-10 15:14:50 |
Message-ID: | 2bf011b9-4694-429d-bef4-cb18159a6cd6@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024/10/08 23:16, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
>
> On 08.10.2024 15:42, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On 2024/09/30 12:26, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>>> In 0002.patch, I also modified the description of num_requested from
>>>>> "Number of backend requested checkpoints" to remove "backend," as it can
>>>>> be confusing since num_requested includes requests from sources other than
>>>>> the backend. Thought?
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. E.g. from xlog. Then maybe changed it also in the function
>>>> descriptions in the pg_proc.dat? For pg_stat_get_checkpointer_num_requested()
>>>> and pg_stat_get_checkpointer_restartpoints_requested().
>>>
>>> Yes, good catch!
>>
>> Patch attached.
>
> Looked at the patch. Just in case, checked that neither
> “backend completed” nor “backend requested” were found anywhere else.
> All is ok for me.
Thanks for the review! Pushed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rohit Sivakumar | 2024-10-10 15:22:48 | Worker parallelism on EXECUTE with a non-zero fetch count |
Previous Message | Mikael Sand | 2024-10-10 15:06:21 | Re: Build issue with postgresql 17 undefined reference to `pg_encoding_to_char' and `pg_char_to_encoding' |