From: | "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |
Date: | 2008-03-14 22:50:47 |
Message-ID: | 2b5e566d0803141550w42850a39m9b1777aba7190722@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I believe that our intention is the same with the pgsql-us-general in
> > that it is the general United States list.
>
> Well, that is not what Selena said. Her agenda was quite specific.
:) I was giving examples of what we might talk about. I was not
creating a definitive list of every topic we would ever allow.
I understand what you're getting at, Peter.
We've started categorizing things a bit better with the groups, but I
don't think that adding -usergroups to the end of the name really
captures what is happening any better than -general does. In fact,
-usergroups is even more misleading, because it will be confused with
the PUGs.
And, at the end, I don't have a better naming convention in mind
either. I have been thinking about it, but everything i've come up
with is no better than what we have.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
United States PostgreSQL Association - http://www.postgresql.us
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-03-14 22:55:15 | Re: Patch to make some strings available to translations |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-03-14 22:42:32 | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |