Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association

From: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association
Date: 2008-03-14 22:50:47
Message-ID: 2b5e566d0803141550w42850a39m9b1777aba7190722@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I believe that our intention is the same with the pgsql-us-general in
> > that it is the general United States list.
>
> Well, that is not what Selena said. Her agenda was quite specific.

:) I was giving examples of what we might talk about. I was not
creating a definitive list of every topic we would ever allow.

I understand what you're getting at, Peter.

We've started categorizing things a bit better with the groups, but I
don't think that adding -usergroups to the end of the name really
captures what is happening any better than -general does. In fact,
-usergroups is even more misleading, because it will be confused with
the PUGs.

And, at the end, I don't have a better naming convention in mind
either. I have been thinking about it, but everything i've come up
with is no better than what we have.

-selena

--
Selena Deckelmann
United States PostgreSQL Association - http://www.postgresql.us
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2008-03-14 22:55:15 Re: Patch to make some strings available to translations
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-03-14 22:42:32 Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association