From: | "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Ron Mayer" <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jean-Paul Argudo" <jean-paul(at)argudo(dot)org>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Date: | 2008-02-04 16:47:46 |
Message-ID: | 2b5e566d0802040847y4eb25272o46471b973b74d125@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Feb 4, 2008 7:07 AM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> >> Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
> >> surely it should be under postgresql.org.
> >
> > Having a separate TLD actually increases the visibility of the effort
> > from a search engine perspective.
> >
> > We can learn a lesson from Perl advocacy - it is still possible to
> > render projects invisible to the outside world through excessive
> > consolidation. A search for "perl blogs" still does not put
> > use.perl.org in the top results.
>
> Firstly, if we could be a tenth as successful as Perl that would be great.
I agree! :)
> Secondly, the above has nothing to do with whether it's in a new domain or not
> and everything to do with how often those blogs are linked to from the outside
> world. I've never heard of them which tells you something about how heavily
> referenced they are.
Ok, I think that I stated things to broadly. The search problem
doesn't affect people who are already in the know - it affects
everyone else. I'm sure you're aware that a large number of
references doesn't necessarily mean that the information has any
quality.
Too much consolidation inhibits growth and probably discourages it. I
was only trying to say that there's nothing wrong with having multiple
domains. If we suddenly had 100 postgresql-related domains pop up
with interesting content, things would be messy for a bit but the
situation would work itself out.
And postgresql.org would still be there to guide the way through the mess.
> In any case search engine optimization is a mugs game. Concentrate on building
> a service that people want to use and people will talk about it and that will
> get you on the search engines. Search engines follow, they don't lead.
I agree except for that last bit. Search is huge and relying only on
word-of-mouth is silly when we have plenty of people who know how to
optimize.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
PDXPUG - Portland PostgreSQL Users Group
http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
http://www.chesnok.com/daily
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-02-04 16:58:28 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2008-02-04 16:38:31 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-04 16:53:50 | Re: msvcr80.dll and PostgreSQL 8.3 under Windows XP |
Previous Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2008-02-04 16:42:45 | Re: loading files into tables |