Re: Logging parallel worker draught

From: Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date: 2024-09-04 15:31:25
Message-ID: 2a8e9e1c-0f05-4ebd-9a4d-d023d26c0def@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I found out in [1] that I am not correctly tracking the workers for
vacuum commands. I trap workers used by
parallel_vacuum_cleanup_all_indexes but not
parallel_vacuum_bulkdel_all_indexes.

Back to the drawing board.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/783bc7f7-659a-42fa-99dd-ee0565644e25(at)dalibo(dot)com

--
Benoit Lobréau
Consultant
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alena Rybakina 2024-09-04 15:31:36 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Nitin Motiani 2024-09-04 15:30:32 Re: race condition in pg_class