From: | AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on system with root as only user |
Date: | 2006-08-30 18:51:39 |
Message-ID: | 2FA058AD-067F-4382-85E5-AC1826B0EE1A@themactionfaction.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Aug 30, 2006, at 13:58 , Brandon Aiken wrote:
> I haven't got any numbers (or a USB stick I can test with at the
> moment)
> but USB is going to be a bottleneck for read and write performance.
> Unless you're accessing very small amounts of data or running small
> queries, I would expect performance to be pretty poor.
Indeed, that's pretty much our scenario- a rack-mounted Linux box
storing mostly inconsequential data (auth creds) with a flash drive-
quasi-embedded, I guess.
>
> If your data set is so small, why do you need a full RDBMS instead of
> flat data/text files or SQLite? If you're not concerned about disk
> media failure, why do you need a transactional DB? It seems like
> putting a deadbolt on a screen door.
MySQL and SQLite have terrible concurrent performance with
transactions. We would also like to take advantage of database-level
replication instead of our fragile home-grown thing for load-sharing
and failover.
>
> It might work just great for your device, of course, but I would not
> expect it to scale well at all.
There are some things I can do- for example, fsync should probably
just be off. I guess I should simply go ahead and try it. Thanks for
the discussion!
-M
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2006-08-30 19:41:35 | Re: Dblink and connections to MySQL? |
Previous Message | Brian Maguire | 2006-08-30 18:15:19 | Dblink and connections to MySQL? |